BROCHURES / DOCUMENTATION
APPLICATION NOTES
SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS
You are researching: Politecnico di Torino
Cell Type
Tissue and Organ Biofabrication
Skin Tissue Engineering
Drug Delivery
Biological Molecules
Solid Dosage Drugs
Stem Cells
Personalised Pharmaceuticals
Inducend Pluripotent Stem Cells (IPSCs)
Drug Discovery
Cancer Cell Lines
All Groups
- Cell Type
- T cells
- Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells (HUVECs)
- Organoids
- Stem Cells
- Spheroids
- Meniscus Cells
- Synoviocytes
- Keratinocytes
- Skeletal Muscle-Derived Cells (SkMDCs)
- Neurons
- Macrophages
- Human Trabecular Meshwork Cells
- Endothelial
- CardioMyocites
- Melanocytes
- Retinal
- Chondrocytes
- Embrionic Kidney (HEK)
- Corneal Stromal Cells
- Annulus Fibrosus Cells
- Fibroblasts
- β cells
- Astrocytes
- Myoblasts
- Pericytes
- Hepatocytes
- Cancer Cell Lines
- Bacteria
- Epicardial Cells
- Articular cartilage progenitor cells (ACPCs)
- Tenocytes
- Extracellular Vesicles
- Osteoblasts
- Monocytes
- Mesothelial cells
- Nucleus Pulposus Cells
- Epithelial
- Neutrophils
- Adipocytes
- Smooth Muscle Cells
- Institution
- Adolphe Merkle Institute Fribourg
- Halle-Wittenberg University
- Baylor College of Medicine
- INM – Leibniz Institute for New Materials
- National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
- University of Vilnius
- Zurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW)
- Innotere
- L'Oreal
- Tiangong University
- Xi’an Children’s Hospital
- ETH Zurich
- Hallym University
- Nanjing Medical University
- University of Bordeaux
- Innsbruck University
- Nanyang Technological University
- National Institutes of Health (NIH)
- Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering (NIMTE)
- KU Leuven
- Politecnico di Torino
- Utrecht Medical Center (UMC)
- Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute
- Queen Mary University
- Veterans Administration Medical Center
- University of Manchester
- University of Bucharest
- Royal Free Hospital
- Hong Kong University
- University of Barcelona
- Chinese Academy of Sciences
- ENEA
- University of Nottingham
- University of Geneva
- SINTEF
- Rice University
- Jiangsu University
- Trinity College
- Novartis
- University of Central Florida
- Hefei University
- Leibniz University Hannover
- Chalmers University of Technology
- Karlsruhe institute of technology
- University of Freiburg
- Helmholtz Institute for Pharmaceutical Research Saarland
- Leipzig University
- AO Research Institute (ARI)
- Shanghai University
- Univerity of Hong Kong
- University of Toronto
- Brown University
- Polish Academy of Sciences
- University of Wurzburg
- Technical University of Dresden
- University of Nantes
- Montreal University
- Shandong Medical University
- Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC)
- University of Michigan – School of Dentistry
- Myiongji University
- Harbin Institute of Technology
- Technical University of Berlin
- University of Amsterdam
- University of Tel Aviv
- University of Applied Sciences Northwestern Switzerland
- Anhui Polytechnic
- University Children's Hospital Zurich
- Bayreuth University
- Aschaffenburg University
- University of Michigan, Biointerfaces Institute
- Abu Dhabi University
- Jiao Tong University
- University of Aveiro
- Ghent University
- Chiao Tung University
- Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute
- University of Sheffield
- University of Michigan – Biointerfaces Institute
- National University of Singapore
- CIC biomaGUNE
- Kaohsiung Medical University
- DTU – Technical University of Denmark
- University of Taiwan
- Biomaterials & Bioinks
- Application
- Personalised Pharmaceuticals
- Bioelectronics
- Biomaterial Processing
- Tissue Models – Drug Discovery
- Industrial
- Drug Discovery
- In Vitro Models
- Robotics
- Electronics – Robotics – Industrial
- Medical Devices
- Tissue and Organ Biofabrication
- Cartilage Tissue Engineering
- Bone Tissue Engineering
- Dental Tissue Engineering
- Drug Delivery
- Urethra Tissue Engineering
- Skin Tissue Engineering
- Uterus Tissue Engineering
- Nerve – Neural Tissue Engineering
- Meniscus Tissue Engineering
- Heart – Cardiac Patches Tissue Engineering
- Adipose Tissue Engineering
- Trachea Tissue Engineering
- Ocular Tissue Engineering
- Intervertebral Disc (IVD) Tissue Engineering
- Muscle Tissue Engineering
- Liver tissue Engineering
- BioSensors
- Review Paper
- Printing Technology
- Biomaterial
- Solid Dosage Drugs
- Thermoplastics
- Coaxial Extruder
- Non-cellularized gels/pastes
- 2-hydroxyethyl-methacrylate (HEMA)
- Phenylacetylene
- Magnetorheological fluid (MR fluid – MRF)
- Salecan
- Poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA)
- PEDOT
- Jeffamine
- Poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA)
- Polyethylene
- SEBS
- Polypropylene Oxide (PPO)
- Carbopol
- Sucrose Acetate
- Epoxy
- poly (ethylene-co -vinyl acetate) (PEVA)
- Poly(itaconate-co-citrate-cooctanediol) (PICO)
- Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAAm)
- Mineral Oil
- poly(octanediol-co-maleic anhydride-co-citrate) (POMaC)
- Poly(Oxazoline)
- Poly(trimethylene carbonate)
- 2-hydroxyethyl) methacrylate (HEMA)
- Zein
- Acrylamide
- Pluronic – Poloxamer
- Polyisobutylene
- Paraffin
- Silicone
- Konjac Gum
- Polyphenylene Oxide
- Ionic Liquids
- Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)
- Gelatin-Sucrose Matrix
- Salt-based
- Chlorella Microalgae
- Acrylates
- Poly(Vinyl Formal)
- Micro/nano-particles
- Biological Molecules
- Bioinks
- Hyaluronic Acid
- Peptide gel
- Methacrylated Silk Fibroin
- Pantoan Methacrylate
- Polyethylene glycol (PEG) based
- α-Bioink
- Poly(Acrylic Acid)
- Collagen
- Elastin
- Heparin
- sulfobetaine methacrylate (SBMA)
- Gelatin
- Matrigel
- Gellan Gum
- Methacrylated Chitosan
- Methacrylated hyaluronic acid (HAMA)
- Pectin
- Silk Fibroin
- Pyrogallol
- Xanthan Gum
- Fibrinogen
- Fibrin
- Paeoniflorin
- Fibronectin
- (2-Hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide (HPMA)
- Methacrylated Collagen (CollMA)
- Carrageenan
- Glucosamine
- Chitosan
- Glycerol
- Poly(glycidol)
- Alginate
- Agarose
- Gelatin-Methacryloyl (GelMA)
- methacrylated chondroitin sulfate (CSMA)
- Cellulose
- Novogel
- carboxybetaine acrylamide (CBAA)
- Ceramics
- Decellularized Extracellular Matrix (dECM)
- Metals
- Bioprinting Technologies
- Bioprinting Applications
AUTHOR
Year
2024
Journal/Proceedings
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Reftype
DOI/URL
DOI
Groups
AbstractGelatin Methacryloyl (GelMA) is one of the most used biomaterials for a wide range of applications, such as drug delivery, disease modeling and tissue regeneration. GelMA is obtained from gelatin, which can be derived from different sources (e.g., bovine skin, and porcine skin), through substitution of reactive amine and hydroxyl groups with methacrylic anhydride (MAA). The degree of functionalization (DoF) can be tuned by varying the MAA amount used; thus, different protocols, with different reaction efficiency, have been developed, using various alkaline buffers (e.g., phosphate-buffered saline, DPBS, or carbonate-bicarbonate solution). Obviously, DoF modulation has an impact on the final GelMA properties, so a deep investigation on the features of the obtained hydrogel must be carried on. The purpose of this study is to investigate how different gelatin sources and synthesis methods affect GelMA properties, as literature lacks direct and systematic comparisons between these parameters, especially between synthesis methods. The final aim is to facilitate the choice of the source or synthesis method according to the needs of the desired application. Hence, chemical and physical properties of GelMA formulations were assessed, determining the DoFs, mechanical and viscoelastic properties by rheological analysis, water absorption by swelling capacity and enzymatic degradation rates. Biological tests with lung adenocarcinoma cells (A549) were performed. Moreover, since 3D bioprinting is a rapidly evolving technology thanks to the possibility of precise deposition of cell-laden biomaterials (bioinks) to mimic the 3D structures of several tissues, the potential of different GelMA formulations as bioinks have been tested with a multi-material approach, revealing its printability and versatility in various applications.
AUTHOR
Year
2024
Journal/Proceedings
Journal of Polymer Science
Reftype
DOI/URL
DOI
Groups
AbstractAbstract Gelatin-methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogel has gained huge success in the last decades thanks to its versatilities in many applications. Notably, one of them is 3D bioprinting, as GelMA physical-mechanical properties and biocompatibility of uncured formulation perfectly suit the requirements of a bioink. Nevertheless, before the photopolymerization, the hydrogel shows weak mechanical properties and long recovery time after stress application, which results in the inability to obtain complex and self-standing forms due to structure collapse. In this work, Carbopol ETD 2020 NF, dissolved in cell culture medium, was used as supporting bath to optimize GelMA bioprinting and overcome its stability limitations. The achieved results demonstrated the possibility of printing shapes containing hollows with lumens or non-planar surfaces, also by using nozzles with larger inner diameter, which reduced cell death during printing process, but were usually avoid because of low resolution. Moreover, constructs' extraction was easier when Carbopol solution was prepared in culture medium rather than in water, reducing sample handling. In conclusion, thanks to this supporting bath, it was possible to print cellularized scaffold, with channels that were then seeded, obtaining inner structure. Further, this Carbopol formulation could be considered an eligible candidate as a supporting bath to obtain GelMA 3D self-standing-shaped and vascularized scaffold.
AUTHOR
Year
2023
Journal/Proceedings
Bioprinting
Reftype
Groups
AbstractThe study proposes a platform for the formation and culture of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) spheroids, to obtain an in vitro model suitable for drug and therapy testing. To achieve that, traditional cell culture is compared to methacrylated gelatin (GelMA) 3D bioprinting, in order to explore not only the potential of the matrix itself, but also the impact of different architectures on spheroid formation. Starting from a systematic analysis, where GelMA concentration, methacrylation degree and cell seeding concentration is set; three different architectures (round, ring and grid) are analyzed in terms of spheroid formation and growth, using 3D bioprinting. The study reveals that Very High GelMA 7.5% w/v formulation, with single cells dispersed in, is the best bioink to obtain NSCLC spheroids. Moreover, grid architecture performs in the best way, because of the highest volume-surface area ratio. The designed GelMA platform can be used as a powerful in vitro tool for drug testing and therapy screening, that can be designed playing with four different parameters: cell concentration, GelMA methacrylation degree, GelMA concentration and geometry.
AUTHOR
Year
2023
Journal/Proceedings
Applied Sciences
Reftype
Groups
Abstract(1) Background: Synovial tissue plays a fundamental role in inflammatory processes. Therefore, understanding the mechanisms regulating healthy and diseased synovium functions, as in rheumatic diseases, is crucial to discovering more effective therapies to minimize or prevent pathological progress. The present study aimed at developing a bioartificial synovial tissue as an in vitro model for drug screening or personalized medicine applications using 3D bioprinting technology. (2) Methods: The volumetric extrusion technique has been used to fabricate cell-laden scaffolds. Gelatin Methacryloyl (GelMA), widely applied in regenerative medicine and tissue engineering, was selected as a bioink and combined with an immortalized cell line of fibroblast-like synoviocytes (K4IM). (3) Results: Three different GelMA formulations, 7.5–10–12.5% w/v, were tested for the fabrication of the scaffold with the desired morphology and internal architecture. GelMA 10% w/v was chosen and combined with K4IM cells to fabricate scaffolds that showed high cell viability and negligible cytotoxicity for up to 14 days tested by Live & Dead and lactate dehydrogenase assays. (4) Conclusions: We successfully 3D bioprinted synoviocytes-laden scaffolds as a proof-of-concept (PoC) towards the fabrication of a 3D synovial membrane model suitable for in vitro studies. However, further research is needed to reproduce the complexity of the synovial microenvironment to better mimic the physiological condition.