BROCHURES / DOCUMENTATION
APPLICATION NOTES
SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS
You are researching: Alveolar
Stem Cells
Personalised Pharmaceuticals
Inducend Pluripotent Stem Cells (IPSCs)
Drug Discovery
Cancer Cell Lines
Cell Type
Tissue and Organ Biofabrication
Skin Tissue Engineering
Drug Delivery
Biological Molecules
Solid Dosage Drugs
All Groups
- Application
- Tissue Models – Drug Discovery
- Medical Devices
- In Vitro Models
- Bioelectronics
- Industrial
- Robotics
- Biomaterial Processing
- Tissue and Organ Biofabrication
- Muscle Tissue Engineering
- Dental Tissue Engineering
- Urethra Tissue Engineering
- Uterus Tissue Engineering
- Gastric Tissue Engineering
- Liver tissue Engineering
- Skin Tissue Engineering
- Nerve – Neural Tissue Engineering
- Meniscus Tissue Engineering
- Heart – Cardiac Patches Tissue Engineering
- Adipose Tissue Engineering
- Trachea Tissue Engineering
- Ocular Tissue Engineering
- Intervertebral Disc (IVD) Tissue Engineering
- Drug Delivery
- Bone Tissue Engineering
- Cartilage Tissue Engineering
- Drug Discovery
- Electronics – Robotics – Industrial
- BioSensors
- Personalised Pharmaceuticals
- Biomaterial
- Coaxial Extruder
- Ceramics
- Metals
- Non-cellularized gels/pastes
- Jeffamine
- Mineral Oil
- Ionic Liquids
- Poly(itaconate-co-citrate-cooctanediol) (PICO)
- poly(octanediol-co-maleic anhydride-co-citrate) (POMaC)
- Zein
- 2-hydroxyethyl) methacrylate (HEMA)
- Paraffin
- Polyphenylene Oxide
- Poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA)
- Polypropylene Oxide (PPO)
- Sucrose Acetate
- Polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB)
- 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA)
- Acrylamide
- Salecan
- SEBS
- Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAAm)
- Poly(Oxazoline)
- Poly(trimethylene carbonate)
- Polyisobutylene
- Konjac Gum
- Gelatin-Sucrose Matrix
- Chlorella Microalgae
- Poly(Vinyl Formal)
- Phenylacetylene
- poly (ethylene-co -vinyl acetate) (PEVA)
- Epoxy
- Carbopol
- Pluronic – Poloxamer
- Silicone
- Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)
- Salt-based
- Acrylates
- 2-hydroxyethyl-methacrylate (HEMA)
- Magnetorheological fluid (MR fluid – MRF)
- Poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA)
- PEDOT
- Polyethylene
- Bioinks
- Xanthan Gum
- Paeoniflorin
- Heparin
- carboxybetaine acrylamide (CBAA)
- Pantoan Methacrylate
- Poly(Acrylic Acid)
- sulfobetaine methacrylate (SBMA)
- Fibronectin
- Methacrylated Silk Fibroin
- Polyethylene glycol (PEG) based
- Novogel
- Peptide gel
- α-Bioink
- Elastin
- Matrigel
- Methacrylated Chitosan
- Pectin
- Pyrogallol
- Fibrin
- Methacrylated Collagen (CollMA)
- methacrylated chondroitin sulfate (CSMA)
- Agarose
- Poly(glycidol)
- Collagen
- Gelatin
- Gellan Gum
- Methacrylated hyaluronic acid (HAMA)
- Silk Fibroin
- Fibrinogen
- (2-Hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide (HPMA)
- Carrageenan
- Chitosan
- Glycerol
- Glucosamine
- Alginate
- Gelatin-Methacryloyl (GelMA)
- Cellulose
- Hyaluronic Acid
- Thermoplastics
- Micro/nano-particles
- Biological Molecules
- Decellularized Extracellular Matrix (dECM)
- Solid Dosage Drugs
- Printing Technology
- Review Paper
- Biomaterials & Bioinks
- Bioprinting Technologies
- Bioprinting Applications
- Institution
- Innsbruck University
- Montreal University
- INM – Leibniz Institute for New Materials
- DTU – Technical University of Denmark
- University of Barcelona
- Rice University
- Hefei University
- Abu Dhabi University
- University of Sheffield
- Harbin Institute of Technology
- University of Toronto
- National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
- Tiangong University
- Anhui Polytechnic
- Novartis
- Royal Free Hospital
- SINTEF
- University of Central Florida
- University of Freiburg
- Univerity of Hong Kong
- University of Nantes
- Myiongji University
- University of Applied Sciences Northwestern Switzerland
- University of Michigan, Biointerfaces Institute
- Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute
- Queen Mary University
- Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering (NIMTE)
- Nanjing Medical University
- Karlsruhe institute of technology
- Shanghai University
- Technical University of Dresden
- University of Michigan – School of Dentistry
- University of Tel Aviv
- Aschaffenburg University
- Chiao Tung University
- CIC biomaGUNE
- Halle-Wittenberg University
- Innotere
- Kaohsiung Medical University
- Baylor College of Medicine
- L'Oreal
- University of Bordeaux
- KU Leuven
- Veterans Administration Medical Center
- Hong Kong University
- ENEA
- Jiangsu University
- Leibniz University Hannover
- Rowan University
- University Hospital Basel
- University of Birmingham
- Warsaw University of Technology
- University of Minnesota
- DWI – Leibniz Institute
- Leipzig University
- Polish Academy of Sciences
- Shandong Medical University
- Technical University of Berlin
- University Children's Hospital Zurich
- University of Aveiro
- University of Michigan – Biointerfaces Institute
- University of Taiwan
- University of Vilnius
- Xi’an Children’s Hospital
- Jiao Tong University
- Brown University
- Helmholtz Institute for Pharmaceutical Research Saarland
- Politecnico di Torino
- Chinese Academy of Sciences
- University of Amsterdam
- Bayreuth University
- Ghent University
- National University of Singapore
- Adolphe Merkle Institute Fribourg
- Zurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW)
- Hallym University
- National Institutes of Health (NIH)
- Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute
- University of Bucharest
- Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC)
- University of Wurzburg
- AO Research Institute (ARI)
- ETH Zurich
- Nanyang Technological University
- Utrecht Medical Center (UMC)
- University of Manchester
- University of Nottingham
- Trinity College
- Chalmers University of Technology
- University of Geneva
- Cell Type
- Macrophages
- Corneal Stromal Cells
- Human Trabecular Meshwork Cells
- Monocytes
- Neutrophils
- Organoids
- Meniscus Cells
- Skeletal Muscle-Derived Cells (SkMDCs)
- Epicardial Cells
- Extracellular Vesicles
- Nucleus Pulposus Cells
- Smooth Muscle Cells
- T cells
- Astrocytes
- Annulus Fibrosus Cells
- Yeast
- Cardiomyocytes
- Hepatocytes
- Mesothelial cells
- Adipocytes
- Synoviocytes
- Endothelial
- CardioMyocites
- Melanocytes
- Retinal
- Embrionic Kidney (HEK)
- β cells
- Pericytes
- Bacteria
- Tenocytes
- Fibroblasts
- Myoblasts
- Cancer Cell Lines
- Articular cartilage progenitor cells (ACPCs)
- Osteoblasts
- Epithelial
- Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells (HUVECs)
- Spheroids
- Keratinocytes
- Chondrocytes
- Stem Cells
- Neurons
AUTHOR
Title
Fabrication and Characterization of 3D Bioprinted Triple-layered Human Alveolar Lung Models
[Abstract]
Year
2021
Journal/Proceedings
International journal of bioprinting
Reftype
DOI/URL
URL
Groups
AbstractThe global prevalence of respiratory diseases caused by infectious pathogens has resulted in an increased demand for realistic in-vitro alveolar lung models to serve as suitable disease models. This demand has resulted in the fabrication of numerous two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) in-vitro alveolar lung models. The ability to fabricate these 3D in-vitro alveolar lung models in an automated manner with high repeatability and reliability is important for potential scalable production. In this study, we reported the fabrication of human triple-layered alveolar lung models comprising of human lung epithelial cells, human endothelial cells, and human lung fibroblasts using the drop-on-demand (DOD) 3D bioprinting technique. The polyvinylpyrrolidone-based bio-inks and the use of a 300 mm nozzle diameter improved the repeatability of the bioprinting process by achieving consistent cell output over time using different human alveolar lung cells. The 3D bioprinted human triple-layered alveolar lung models were able to maintain cell viability with relative similar proliferation profile over time as compared to non-printed cells. This DOD 3D bioprinting platform offers an attractive tool for highly repeatable and scalable fabrication of 3D in-vitro human alveolar lung models.
AUTHOR
Title
3D bioprinting of E. coli MG1655 biofilms on human lung epithelial cells for building complex in vitro infection models
[Abstract]
Year
2023
Journal/Proceedings
Biofabrication
Reftype
DOI/URL
DOI
Groups
AbstractBiofilm-associated infections are causing over half a million deaths each year, raising the requirement for innovative therapeutic approaches. For developing novel therapeutics against bacterial biofilm infections, complex in vitro models that allow to study drug effects on both pathogens and host cells as well as their interaction under controlled, physiologically relevant conditions appear as highly desirable. Nonetheless, building such models is quite challenging because (1) rapid bacterial growth and release of virulence factors may lead to premature host cell death and (2) maintaining the biofilm status under suitable co-culture requires a highly controlled environment. To approach that problem, we chose 3D bioprinting. However, printing living bacterial biofilms in defined shapes on human cell models, requires bioinks with very specific properties. Hence, this work aims to develop a 3D bioprinting biofilm method to build robust in vitro infection models. Based on rheology, printability and bacterial growth, a bioink containing 3% gelatin and 1% alginate in Luria-Bertani-medium was found optimal for Escherichia coli MG1655 biofilms. Biofilm properties were maintained after printing, as shown visually via microscopy techniques as well as in antibiotic susceptibility assays. Metabolic profile analysis of bioprinted biofilms showed high similarity to native biofilms. After printing on human bronchial epithelial cells (Calu-3), the shape of printed biofilms was maintained even after dissolution of non-crosslinked bioink, while no cytotoxicity was observed over 24 h. Therefore, the approach presented here may provide a platform for building complex in vitro infection models comprising bacterial biofilms and human host cells.
AUTHOR
Year
2020
Journal/Proceedings
Reftype
DOI/URL
DOI
Groups
AbstractIncreasing ethical and biological concerns require a paradigm shift toward animal-free testing strategies for drug testing and hazard assessments. To this end, the application of bioprinting technology in the field of biomedicine is driving a rapid progress in tissue engineering. In particular, standardized and reproducible in vitro models produced by three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting technique represent a possible alternative to animal models, enabling in vitro studies relevant to in vivo conditions. The innovative approach of 3D bioprinting allows a spatially controlled deposition of cells and biomaterial in a layer-by-layer fashion providing a platform for engineering reproducible models. However, despite the promising and revolutionizing character of 3D bioprinting technology, standardized protocols providing detailed instructions are lacking. Here, we provide a protocol for the automatized printing of simple alveolar, bronchial, and intestine epithelial cell layers as the basis for more complex respiratory and gastrointestinal tissue models. Such systems will be useful for high-throughput toxicity screening and drug efficacy evaluation.
AUTHOR
Title
Investigation of drug dissolution and uptake from low-density DPI formulations in an impactor–integrated cell culture model
[Abstract]
Year
2020
Journal/Proceedings
European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics
Reftype
Groups
AbstractBesides deposition, pulmonary bioavailability is determined by dissolution of particles in the scarce epithelial fluid and by cellular API uptake. In the present work, we have developed an experimental in vitro model, which is combining the state-of-the-art next generation impactor (NGI), used for aerodynamic performance assessment of inhalation products, with a culture of human alveolar A549 epithelial cells to study the fate of inhaled drugs following lung deposition. The goal was to investigate five previously developed nano-milled and spray-dried budesonide formulations and to examine the suitability of the in vitro test model. The NGI dissolution cups of stages 3, 4, and 5 were transformed to accommodate cell culture inserts while assuring minimal interference with the air flow. A549 cells were cultivated at the air–liquid interface on Corning® Matrigel® -coated inserts. After deposition of aerodynamically classified powders on the cell cultures, budesonide amount was determined on the cell surface, in the interior of the cell monolayer, and in the basal solution for four to eight hours. Significant differences in the total deposited drug amount and the amount remaining on the cell surface at the end of the experiment were found between different formulations and NGI stages. Roughly 50% of budesonide was taken up by the cells and converted to a large extent to its metabolic conjugate with oleic acid for all formulations and stages. Prolonged time required for complete drug dissolution and cell uptake in case of large deposited powder amounts suggested initial drug saturation of the surfactant layer of the cell surface. Discrimination between formulations with respect to time scale of dissolution and cell uptake was possible with the present test model providing useful insights into the biopharmaceutical performance of developed formulations that may be relevant for predicting local bioavailability. The absolute quantitative result of cell uptake and permeation into the systemic compartment is unreliable, though, because of partly compromised cell membrane integrity due to particle impaction and professed leakiness of A549 monolayer tight junctions, respectively.
AUTHOR
Year
2015
Journal/Proceedings
Scientific reports
Reftype
DOI/URL
URL
Groups
AbstractIntensive efforts in recent years to develop and commercialize in vitro alternatives in the field of risk assessment have yielded new promising two- and three dimensional (3D) cell culture models. Nevertheless, a realistic 3D in vitro alveolar model is not available yet. Here we report on the biofabrication of the human air-blood tissue barrier analogue composed of an endothelial cell, basement membrane and epithelial cell layer by using a bioprinting technology. In contrary to the manual method, we demonstrate that this technique enables automatized and reproducible creation of thinner and more homogeneous cell layers, which is required for an optimal air-blood tissue barrier. This bioprinting platform will offer an excellent tool to engineer an advanced 3D lung model for high-throughput screening for safety assessment and drug efficacy testing.
