APPLICATION NOTES
BROCHURES / DOCUMENTATION
SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS
You are researching: Carbopol
Drug Discovery
Cancer Cell Lines
Cell Type
Tissue and Organ Biofabrication
Skin Tissue Engineering
Drug Delivery
Biological Molecules
Solid Dosage Drugs
Stem Cells
Personalised Pharmaceuticals
Inducend Pluripotent Stem Cells (IPSCs)
All Groups
- Printing Technology
- Biomaterial
- Ceramics
- Metals
- Bioinks
- Fibronectin
- Xanthan Gum
- Paeoniflorin
- Methacrylated Silk Fibroin
- Heparin
- Fibrinogen
- (2-Hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide (HPMA)
- Carrageenan
- Chitosan
- Glycerol
- Poly(glycidol)
- Agarose
- methacrylated chondroitin sulfate (CSMA)
- Silk Fibroin
- Methacrylated hyaluronic acid (HAMA)
- Gellan Gum
- Alginate
- Gelatin-Methacryloyl (GelMA)
- Cellulose
- Hyaluronic Acid
- Polyethylene glycol (PEG) based
- Collagen
- Gelatin
- Novogel
- Peptide gel
- α-Bioink
- Elastin
- Matrigel
- Methacrylated Chitosan
- Pectin
- Pyrogallol
- Fibrin
- Methacrylated Collagen (CollMA)
- Glucosamine
- Non-cellularized gels/pastes
- 2-hydroxyethyl) methacrylate (HEMA)
- Paraffin
- Polyphenylene Oxide
- Acrylamide
- SEBS
- Ionic Liquids
- Jeffamine
- Mineral Oil
- Salecan
- Zein
- poly(octanediol-co-maleic anhydride-co-citrate) (POMaC)
- Poly(itaconate-co-citrate-cooctanediol) (PICO)
- Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)
- Salt-based
- Acrylates
- 2-hydroxyethyl-methacrylate (HEMA)
- Magnetorheological fluid (MR fluid – MRF)
- Poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA)
- PEDOT
- Polyethylene
- Silicone
- Pluronic – Poloxamer
- Carbopol
- Epoxy
- poly (ethylene-co -vinyl acetate) (PEVA)
- Phenylacetylene
- Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAAm)
- Poly(Oxazoline)
- Poly(trimethylene carbonate)
- Polyisobutylene
- Konjac Gum
- Gelatin-Sucrose Matrix
- Chlorella Microalgae
- Poly(Vinyl Formal)
- Thermoplastics
- Micro/nano-particles
- Biological Molecules
- Decellularized Extracellular Matrix (dECM)
- Solid Dosage Drugs
- Review Paper
- Application
- Tissue Models – Drug Discovery
- BioSensors
- Personalised Pharmaceuticals
- In Vitro Models
- Bioelectronics
- Industrial
- Robotics
- Medical Devices
- Electronics – Robotics – Industrial
- Biomaterial Processing
- Tissue and Organ Biofabrication
- Liver tissue Engineering
- Muscle Tissue Engineering
- Nerve – Neural Tissue Engineering
- Meniscus Tissue Engineering
- Heart – Cardiac Patches Tissue Engineering
- Adipose Tissue Engineering
- Trachea Tissue Engineering
- Ocular Tissue Engineering
- Intervertebral Disc (IVD) Tissue Engineering
- Vascularization
- Skin Tissue Engineering
- Drug Delivery
- Cartilage Tissue Engineering
- Bone Tissue Engineering
- Drug Discovery
- Institution
- Myiongji University
- Hong Kong University
- Veterans Administration Medical Center
- University of Applied Sciences Northwestern Switzerland
- University of Michigan, Biointerfaces Institute
- Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute
- Kaohsiung Medical University
- Baylor College of Medicine
- L'Oreal
- University of Bordeaux
- KU Leuven
- Abu Dhabi University
- University of Sheffield
- DTU – Technical University of Denmark
- Hefei University
- Rice University
- University of Barcelona
- INM – Leibniz Institute for New Materials
- University of Nantes
- Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC)
- University of Amsterdam
- Bayreuth University
- Ghent University
- National University of Singapore
- Adolphe Merkle Institute Fribourg
- Zurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW)
- Hallym University
- University of Wurzburg
- AO Research Institute (ARI)
- Chalmers University of Technology
- ETH Zurich
- Nanyang Technological University
- Utrecht Medical Center (UMC)
- University of Manchester
- University of Nottingham
- Trinity College
- National Institutes of Health (NIH)
- Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute
- University of Bucharest
- Innotere
- Nanjing Medical University
- Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering (NIMTE)
- Queen Mary University
- Royal Free Hospital
- SINTEF
- University of Central Florida
- University of Freiburg
- Halle-Wittenberg University
- CIC biomaGUNE
- Chiao Tung University
- University of Geneva
- Novartis
- Karlsruhe institute of technology
- Shanghai University
- Technical University of Dresden
- University of Michigan – School of Dentistry
- University of Tel Aviv
- Aschaffenburg University
- Univerity of Hong Kong
- Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Helmholtz Institute for Pharmaceutical Research Saarland
- Brown University
- Innsbruck University
- National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
- Tiangong University
- Harbin Institute of Technology
- Montreal University
- Anhui Polytechnic
- Jiao Tong University
- University of Toronto
- Politecnico di Torino
- Biomaterials & Bioinks
- Bioprinting Technologies
- Bioprinting Applications
- Cell Type
- Organoids
- Meniscus Cells
- Skeletal Muscle-Derived Cells (SkMDCs)
- Hepatocytes
- Monocytes
- Neutrophils
- Macrophages
- Corneal Stromal Cells
- Mesothelial cells
- Adipocytes
- Synoviocytes
- Human Trabecular Meshwork Cells
- Epithelial
- Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells (HUVECs)
- Spheroids
- Keratinocytes
- Neurons
- Endothelial
- CardioMyocites
- Osteoblasts
- Articular cartilage progenitor cells (ACPCs)
- Cancer Cell Lines
- Chondrocytes
- Fibroblasts
- Myoblasts
- Melanocytes
- Retinal
- Embrionic Kidney (HEK)
- β cells
- Pericytes
- Bacteria
- Tenocytes
- Stem Cells
AUTHOR
Title
A dual osteoconductive-osteoprotective implantable device for vertical alveolar ridge augmentation
[Abstract]
Year
2023
Journal/Proceedings
Frontiers in Dental Medicine
Reftype
DOI/URL
DOI
Groups
AbstractRepair of large oral bone defects such as vertical alveolar ridge augmentation could benefit from the rapidly developing additive manufacturing technology used to create personalized osteoconductive devices made from porous tricalcium phosphate/hydroxyapatite (TCP/HA)-based bioceramics. These devices can be also used as hydrogel carriers to improve their osteogenic potential. However, the TCP/HA constructs are prone to brittle fracture, therefore their use in clinical situations is difficult. As a solution, we propose the protection of this osteoconductive multi-material (herein called “core”) with a shape-matched “cover” made from biocompatible poly-ɛ-caprolactone (PCL), which is a ductile, and thus more resistant polymeric material. In this report, we present a workflow starting from patient-specific medical scan in Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) format files, up to the design and 3D printing of a hydrogel-loaded porous TCP/HA core and of its corresponding PCL cover. This cover could also facilitate the anchoring of the device to the patient's defect site via fixing screws. The large, linearly aligned pores in the TCP/HA bioceramic core, their sizes, and their filling with an alginate hydrogel were analyzed by micro-CT. Moreover, we created a finite element analysis (FEA) model of this dual-function device, which permits the simulation of its mechanical behavior in various anticipated clinical situations, as well as optimization before surgery. In conclusion, we designed and 3D-printed a novel, structurally complex multi-material osteoconductive-osteoprotective device with anticipated mechanical properties suitable for large-defect oral bone regeneration.
AUTHOR
Title
3D Printing of Human Ossicle Models for the Biofabrication of Personalized Middle Ear Prostheses
[Abstract]
Year
2022
Journal/Proceedings
Applied Sciences
Reftype
Groups
AbstractThe middle ear bones (‘ossicles’) may become severely damaged due to accidents or to diseases. In these situations, the most common current treatments include replacing them with cadaver-derived ossicles, using a metal (usually titanium) prosthesis, or introducing bridges made of biocompatible ceramics. Neither of these solutions is ideal, due to the difficulty in finding or producing shape-matching replacements. However, the advent of additive manufacturing applications to biomedical problems has created the possibility of 3D-printing anatomically correct, shape- and size-personalized ossicle prostheses. To demonstrate this concept, we generated and printed several models of ossicles, as solid, porous, or soft material structures. These models were first printed with a plottable calcium phosphate/hydroxyapatite paste by extrusion on a solid support or embedded in a Carbopol hydrogel bath, followed by temperature-induced hardening. We then also printed an ossicle model with this ceramic in a porous format, followed by loading and crosslinking an alginate hydrogel within the pores, which was validated by microCT imaging. Finally, ossicle models were printed using alginate as well as a cell-containing nanocellulose-based bioink, within the supporting hydrogel bath. In selected cases, the devised workflow and the printouts were tested for repeatability. In conclusion, we demonstrate that moving beyond simplistic geometric bridges to anatomically realistic constructs is possible by 3D printing with various biocompatible materials and hydrogels, thus opening the way towards the in vitro generation of personalized middle ear prostheses for implantation.
AUTHOR
Title
3D Printing of Human Ossicle Models for the Biofabrication of Personalized Middle Ear Prostheses
[Abstract]
Year
2022
Journal/Proceedings
Applied Sciences
Reftype
Groups
AbstractThe middle ear bones (‘ossicles’) may become severely damaged due to accidents or to diseases. In these situations, the most common current treatments include replacing them with cadaver-derived ossicles, using a metal (usually titanium) prosthesis, or introducing bridges made of biocompatible ceramics. Neither of these solutions is ideal, due to the difficulty in finding or producing shape-matching replacements. However, the advent of additive manufacturing applications to biomedical problems has created the possibility of 3D-printing anatomically correct, shape- and size-personalized ossicle prostheses. To demonstrate this concept, we generated and printed several models of ossicles, as solid, porous, or soft material structures. These models were first printed with a plottable calcium phosphate/hydroxyapatite paste by extrusion on a solid support or embedded in a Carbopol hydrogel bath, followed by temperature-induced hardening. We then also printed an ossicle model with this ceramic in a porous format, followed by loading and crosslinking an alginate hydrogel within the pores, which was validated by microCT imaging. Finally, ossicle models were printed using alginate as well as a cell-containing nanocellulose-based bioink, within the supporting hydrogel bath. In selected cases, the devised workflow and the printouts were tested for repeatability. In conclusion, we demonstrate that moving beyond simplistic geometric bridges to anatomically realistic constructs is possible by 3D printing with various biocompatible materials and hydrogels, thus opening the way towards the in vitro generation of personalized middle ear prostheses for implantation.
AUTHOR
Title
3D Printing of Human Ossicle Models for the Biofabrication of Personalized Middle Ear Prostheses
[Abstract]
Year
2022
Journal/Proceedings
Applied Sciences
Reftype
Groups
AbstractThe middle ear bones (‘ossicles’) may become severely damaged due to accidents or to diseases. In these situations, the most common current treatments include replacing them with cadaver-derived ossicles, using a metal (usually titanium) prosthesis, or introducing bridges made of biocompatible ceramics. Neither of these solutions is ideal, due to the difficulty in finding or producing shape-matching replacements. However, the advent of additive manufacturing applications to biomedical problems has created the possibility of 3D-printing anatomically correct, shape- and size-personalized ossicle prostheses. To demonstrate this concept, we generated and printed several models of ossicles, as solid, porous, or soft material structures. These models were first printed with a plottable calcium phosphate/hydroxyapatite paste by extrusion on a solid support or embedded in a Carbopol hydrogel bath, followed by temperature-induced hardening. We then also printed an ossicle model with this ceramic in a porous format, followed by loading and crosslinking an alginate hydrogel within the pores, which was validated by microCT imaging. Finally, ossicle models were printed using alginate as well as a cell-containing nanocellulose-based bioink, within the supporting hydrogel bath. In selected cases, the devised workflow and the printouts were tested for repeatability. In conclusion, we demonstrate that moving beyond simplistic geometric bridges to anatomically realistic constructs is possible by 3D printing with various biocompatible materials and hydrogels, thus opening the way towards the in vitro generation of personalized middle ear prostheses for implantation.
AUTHOR
Title
Machine Learning Reveals a General Understanding of Printability in Formulations Based on Rheology Additives
[Abstract]
Year
2022
Journal/Proceedings
Advanced Science
Reftype
DOI/URL
DOI
Groups
AbstractAbstract Hydrogel ink formulations based on rheology additives are becoming increasingly popular as they enable 3-dimensional (3D) printing of non-printable but biologically relevant materials. Despite the widespread use, a generalized understanding of how these hydrogel formulations become printable is still missing, mainly due to their variety and diversity. Employing an interpretable machine learning approach allows the authors to explain the process of rendering printability through bulk rheological indices, with no bias toward the composition of formulations and the type of rheology additives. Based on an extensive library of rheological data and printability scores for 180 different formulations, 13 critical rheological measures that describe the printability of hydrogel formulations, are identified. Using advanced statistical methods, it is demonstrated that even though unique criteria to predict printability on a global scale are highly unlikely, the accretive and collaborative nature of rheological measures provides a qualitative and physically interpretable guideline for designing new printable materials.
AUTHOR
Title
Direct Writing of Elastic Fibers with Optical, Electrical, and Microfluidic Functionality
[Abstract]
Year
2019
Journal/Proceedings
Advanced Materials Technologies
Reftype
DOI/URL
DOI
Groups
AbstractAbstract Direct Ink Writing is an additive fabrication technology that allows the integration of a diverse range of functional materials into soft and bioinspired devices such as robots and human-machine interfaces. Typically, a viscoelastic ink is extruded from a nozzle as a continuous filament of circular cross section. Here it is shown that a careful selection of printing parameters such as nozzle height and speed can produce filaments with a range of cross-sectional geometries. Thus, elliptic cylinder-, ribbon-, or groove-shaped filaments can be printed. By using the nozzle as a stylus for postprint filament modification, even filaments with an embedded microfluidic channel can be produced. This strategy is applied to directly write freeform and elastic optical fibers, electrical interconnects, and microfluidics. The integration of these components into simple sensor-actuator systems is demonstrated. Prototypes of an optical fiber with steerable tip and a thermal actuation system for soft tissues are presented.