APPLICATION NOTES
BROCHURES / DOCUMENTATION
SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS
You are researching: Ghent University
Cell Type
Tissue and Organ Biofabrication
Skin Tissue Engineering
Drug Delivery
Biological Molecules
Solid Dosage Drugs
Stem Cells
Personalised Pharmaceuticals
Inducend Pluripotent Stem Cells (IPSCs)
Drug Discovery
Cancer Cell Lines
All Groups
- Bioprinting Applications
- Cell Type
- Myoblasts
- Pericytes
- Hepatocytes
- Cancer Cell Lines
- Bacteria
- Epicardial Cells
- Articular cartilage progenitor cells (ACPCs)
- Tenocytes
- Extracellular Vesicles
- Osteoblasts
- Monocytes
- Mesothelial cells
- Nucleus Pulposus Cells
- Epithelial
- Neutrophils
- Adipocytes
- Smooth Muscle Cells
- T cells
- Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells (HUVECs)
- Organoids
- Stem Cells
- Spheroids
- Meniscus Cells
- Synoviocytes
- Keratinocytes
- Skeletal Muscle-Derived Cells (SkMDCs)
- Neurons
- Macrophages
- Human Trabecular Meshwork Cells
- Endothelial
- CardioMyocites
- Melanocytes
- Retinal
- Chondrocytes
- Embrionic Kidney (HEK)
- Corneal Stromal Cells
- Annulus Fibrosus Cells
- Fibroblasts
- β cells
- Astrocytes
- Institution
- Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC)
- University of Michigan – School of Dentistry
- Myiongji University
- Harbin Institute of Technology
- Technical University of Berlin
- University of Amsterdam
- University of Tel Aviv
- University of Applied Sciences Northwestern Switzerland
- Anhui Polytechnic
- University Children's Hospital Zurich
- Bayreuth University
- Aschaffenburg University
- University of Michigan, Biointerfaces Institute
- Abu Dhabi University
- Jiao Tong University
- University of Aveiro
- Ghent University
- Chiao Tung University
- Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute
- University of Sheffield
- University of Michigan – Biointerfaces Institute
- National University of Singapore
- CIC biomaGUNE
- Kaohsiung Medical University
- DTU – Technical University of Denmark
- University of Taiwan
- Adolphe Merkle Institute Fribourg
- Halle-Wittenberg University
- Baylor College of Medicine
- INM – Leibniz Institute for New Materials
- National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
- University of Vilnius
- Zurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW)
- Innotere
- L'Oreal
- Tiangong University
- Xi’an Children’s Hospital
- ETH Zurich
- Hallym University
- Nanjing Medical University
- University of Bordeaux
- Innsbruck University
- Nanyang Technological University
- National Institutes of Health (NIH)
- Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering (NIMTE)
- KU Leuven
- Politecnico di Torino
- Utrecht Medical Center (UMC)
- Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute
- Queen Mary University
- Veterans Administration Medical Center
- University of Manchester
- University of Bucharest
- Royal Free Hospital
- Hong Kong University
- University of Barcelona
- Chinese Academy of Sciences
- ENEA
- University of Nottingham
- University of Geneva
- SINTEF
- Rice University
- Jiangsu University
- Trinity College
- Novartis
- University of Central Florida
- Hefei University
- Leibniz University Hannover
- Chalmers University of Technology
- Karlsruhe institute of technology
- University of Freiburg
- Helmholtz Institute for Pharmaceutical Research Saarland
- Leipzig University
- AO Research Institute (ARI)
- Shanghai University
- Univerity of Hong Kong
- University of Toronto
- Brown University
- Polish Academy of Sciences
- University of Wurzburg
- Technical University of Dresden
- University of Nantes
- Montreal University
- Shandong Medical University
- Biomaterials & Bioinks
- Application
- Biomaterial Processing
- Tissue Models – Drug Discovery
- Industrial
- Drug Discovery
- In Vitro Models
- Robotics
- Electronics – Robotics – Industrial
- Medical Devices
- Tissue and Organ Biofabrication
- Intervertebral Disc (IVD) Tissue Engineering
- Muscle Tissue Engineering
- Liver tissue Engineering
- Cartilage Tissue Engineering
- Bone Tissue Engineering
- Dental Tissue Engineering
- Drug Delivery
- Urethra Tissue Engineering
- Skin Tissue Engineering
- Uterus Tissue Engineering
- Nerve – Neural Tissue Engineering
- Meniscus Tissue Engineering
- Heart – Cardiac Patches Tissue Engineering
- Adipose Tissue Engineering
- Trachea Tissue Engineering
- Ocular Tissue Engineering
- BioSensors
- Personalised Pharmaceuticals
- Bioelectronics
- Review Paper
- Printing Technology
- Biomaterial
- Micro/nano-particles
- Biological Molecules
- Bioinks
- Glycerol
- Poly(glycidol)
- Alginate
- Agarose
- Gelatin-Methacryloyl (GelMA)
- methacrylated chondroitin sulfate (CSMA)
- Cellulose
- Novogel
- carboxybetaine acrylamide (CBAA)
- Hyaluronic Acid
- Peptide gel
- Methacrylated Silk Fibroin
- Pantoan Methacrylate
- Polyethylene glycol (PEG) based
- α-Bioink
- Poly(Acrylic Acid)
- Collagen
- Elastin
- Heparin
- sulfobetaine methacrylate (SBMA)
- Gelatin
- Matrigel
- Gellan Gum
- Methacrylated Chitosan
- Methacrylated hyaluronic acid (HAMA)
- Pectin
- Silk Fibroin
- Pyrogallol
- Xanthan Gum
- Fibrinogen
- Fibrin
- Paeoniflorin
- Fibronectin
- (2-Hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide (HPMA)
- Methacrylated Collagen (CollMA)
- Carrageenan
- Glucosamine
- Chitosan
- Ceramics
- Decellularized Extracellular Matrix (dECM)
- Metals
- Solid Dosage Drugs
- Thermoplastics
- Coaxial Extruder
- Non-cellularized gels/pastes
- Pluronic – Poloxamer
- Polyisobutylene
- Paraffin
- Silicone
- Konjac Gum
- Polyphenylene Oxide
- Ionic Liquids
- Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)
- Gelatin-Sucrose Matrix
- Salt-based
- Chlorella Microalgae
- Acrylates
- Poly(Vinyl Formal)
- 2-hydroxyethyl-methacrylate (HEMA)
- Phenylacetylene
- Magnetorheological fluid (MR fluid – MRF)
- Salecan
- Poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA)
- PEDOT
- Jeffamine
- Poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA)
- Polyethylene
- SEBS
- Polypropylene Oxide (PPO)
- Carbopol
- Sucrose Acetate
- Epoxy
- poly (ethylene-co -vinyl acetate) (PEVA)
- Poly(itaconate-co-citrate-cooctanediol) (PICO)
- Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAAm)
- Mineral Oil
- poly(octanediol-co-maleic anhydride-co-citrate) (POMaC)
- Poly(Oxazoline)
- Poly(trimethylene carbonate)
- 2-hydroxyethyl) methacrylate (HEMA)
- Zein
- Acrylamide
- Bioprinting Technologies
AUTHOR
Title
High-throughput fabrication of vascularized adipose microtissues for 3D bioprinting
[Abstract]
Year
2020
Journal/Proceedings
Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Reftype
DOI/URL
DOI
Groups
AbstractAbstract For patients with soft tissue defects, repair with autologous in vitro engineered adipose tissue could be a promising alternative to current surgical therapies. A volume-persistent engineered adipose tissue construct under in vivo conditions can only be achieved by early vascularization after transplantation. The combination of 3D bioprinting technology with self-assembling microvascularized units as building blocks can potentially answer the need for a microvascular network. In the present study, co-culture spheroids combining adipose-derived stem cells (ASC) and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) were created with an ideal geometry for bioprinting. When applying the favourable seeding technique and condition, compact viable spheroids were obtained, demonstrating high adipogenic differentiation and capillary-like network formation after 7 and 14 days of culture, as shown by live/dead analysis, immunohistochemistry and RT-qPCR. Moreover, we were able to successfully 3D bioprint the encapsulated spheroids, resulting in compact viable spheroids presenting capillary-like structures, lipid droplets and spheroid outgrowth after 14 days of culture. This is the first study that generates viable high-throughput (pre-)vascularized adipose microtissues as building blocks for bioprinting applications using a novel ASC/HUVEC co-culture spheroid model, which enables both adipogenic differentiation while simultaneously supporting the formation of prevascular-like structures within engineered tissues in vitro.
AUTHOR
Title
Bioprinting predifferentiated adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell spheroids with methacrylated gelatin ink for adipose tissue engineering
[Abstract]
Year
2020
Journal/Proceedings
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
Reftype
Colle2020
DOI/URL
DOI
Groups
AbstractThe increasing number of mastectomies results in a greater demand for breast reconstruction characterized by simplicity and a low complication profile. Reconstructive surgeons are investigating tissue engineering (TE) strategies to overcome the current surgical drawbacks. 3D bioprinting is the rising technique for the fabrication of large tissue constructs which provides a potential solution for unmet clinical needs in breast reconstruction building on decades of experience in autologous fat grafting, adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell (ASC) biology and TE. A scaffold was bioprinted using encapsulated ASC spheroids in methacrylated gelatin ink (GelMA). Uniform ASC spheroids with an ideal geometry and diameter for bioprinting were formed, using a high-throughput non-adhesive agarose microwell system. ASC spheroids in adipogenic differentiation medium (ADM) were evaluated through live/dead staining, histology (HE, Oil Red O), TEM and RT-qPCR. Viable spheroids were obtained for up to 14 days post-printing and showed multilocular microvacuoles and successful differentiation toward mature adipocytes shown by gene expression analysis. Moreover, spheroids were able to assemble at random in GelMA, creating a macrotissue. Combining the advantage of microtissues to self-assemble and the controlled organization by bioprinting technologies, these ASC spheroids can be useful as building blocks for the engineering of soft tissue implants.
AUTHOR
Title
3D-printed wound dressings containing a fosmidomycin-derivative prevent Acinetobacter baumannii biofilm formation
[Abstract]
Year
2023
Journal/Proceedings
iScience
Reftype
Groups
AbstractSummary Acinetobacter baumannii causes a wide range of infections, including wound infections. Multidrug-resistant A. baumannii is a major healthcare concern and the development of novel treatments against these infections is needed. Fosmidomycin is a repurposed antimalarial drug targeting the non-mevalonate pathway, and several derivatives show activity towards A. baumannii. We evaluated the antimicrobial activity of CC366, a fosmidomycin prodrug, against a collection of A. baumannii strains, using various in vitro and in vivo models; emphasis was placed on the evaluation of its anti-biofilm activity. We also developed a 3D-printed wound dressing containing CC366, using melt electrowriting technology. Minimal inhibitory concentrations of CC366 ranged from 1 to 64 μg/mL, and CC366 showed good biofilm inhibitory and moderate biofilm eradicating activity in vitro. CC366 successfully eluted from a 3D-printed dressing, the dressings prevented the formation of A. baumannnii wound biofilms in vitro and reduced A. baumannii infection in an in vivo mouse model.
AUTHOR
Title
Tuning the Phenotype of Cartilage Tissue Mimics by Varying Spheroid Maturation and Methacrylamide-Modified Gelatin Hydrogel Characteristics
[Abstract]
Year
2021
Journal/Proceedings
Macromolecular Bioscience
Reftype
DOI/URL
DOI
Groups
AbstractAbstract In hybrid bioprinting of cartilage tissue constructs, spheroids are used as cellular building blocks and combined with biomaterials for dispensing. However, biomaterial intrinsic cues can deeply affect cell fate and to date, the influence of hydrogel encapsulation on spheroid viability and phenotype has received limited attention. This study assesses this need and unravels 1) how the phenotype of spheroid-laden constructs can be tuned through adjusting the hydrogel physico–chemical properties and 2) if the spheroid maturation stage prior to encapsulation is a determining factor for the construct phenotype. Articular chondrocyte spheroids with a cartilage specific extracellular matrix (ECM) are generated and different maturation stages, early-, mid-, and late-stage (3, 7, and 14 days, respectively), are harvested and encapsulated in 10, 15, or 20 w/v% methacrylamide-modified gelatin (gelMA) for 14 days. The encapsulation of immature spheroids do not lead to a cartilage-like ECM production but when more mature mid- or late-stage spheroids are combined with a certain concentration of gelMA, a fibrocartilage-like as well as a hyaline cartilage-like phenotype can be induced. As a proof of concept, late-stage spheroids are bioprinted using a 10 w/v% gelMA–Irgacure 2959 solution with the aim to test the processing potential of the spheroid-laden bioink.
AUTHOR
Title
Hybrid Bioprinting of Chondrogenically Induced Human Mesenchymal Stem Cell Spheroids
[Abstract]
Year
2020
Journal/Proceedings
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Reftype
DOI/URL
DOI
Groups
AbstractTo date, the treatment of articular cartilage lesions remains challenging. A promising strategy for the development of new regenerative therapies is hybrid bioprinting, combining the principles of developmental biology, biomaterial science, and 3D bioprinting. In this approach, scaffold-free cartilage microtissues with small diameters are used as building blocks, combined with a photo-crosslinkable hydrogel and subsequently bioprinted. Spheroids of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hBM-MSC) are created using a high-throughput microwell system and chondrogenic differentiation is induced during 42 days by applying chondrogenic culture medium and low oxygen tension (5%). Stable and homogeneous cartilage spheroids with a mean diameter of 116 ± 2.80 μm, which is compatible with bioprinting, were created after 14 days of culture and a glycosaminoglycans (GAG)- and collagen II-positive extracellular matrix (ECM) was observed. Spheroids were able to assemble at random into a macrotissue, driven by developmental biology tissue fusion processes, and after 72 h of culture, a compact macrotissue was formed. In a directed assembly approach, spheroids were assembled with high spatial control using the bio-ink based extrusion bioprinting approach. Therefore, 14-day spheroids were combined with a photo-crosslinkable methacrylamide-modified gelatin (gelMA) as viscous printing medium to ensure shape fidelity of the printed construct. The photo-initiators Irgacure 2959 and Li-TPO-L were evaluated by assessing their effect on bio-ink properties and the chondrogenic phenotype. The encapsulation in gelMA resulted in further chondrogenic maturation observed by an increased production of GAG and a reduction of collagen I. Moreover, the use of Li-TPO-L lead to constructs with lower stiffness which induced a decrease of collagen I and an increase in GAG and collagen II production. After 3D bioprinting, spheroids remained viable and the cartilage phenotype was maintained. Our findings demonstrate that hBM-MSC spheroids are able to differentiate into cartilage microtissues and display a geometry compatible with 3D bioprinting. Furthermore, for hybrid bioprinting of these spheroids, gelMA is a promising material as it exhibits favorable properties in terms of printability and it supports the viability and chondrogenic phenotype of hBM-MSC microtissues. Moreover, it was shown that a lower hydrogel stiffness enhances further chondrogenic maturation after bioprinting.
AUTHOR
Year
2016
Journal/Proceedings
Biofabrication
Reftype
DOI/URL
URL
AbstractBioprinting is a process based on additive manufacturing from materials containing living cells. These materials, often referred to as bioink, are based on cytocompatible hydrogel precursor formulations, which gel in a manner compatible with different bioprinting approaches. The bioink properties before, during and after gelation are essential for its printability, comprising such features as achievable structural resolution, shape fidelity and cell survival. However, it is the final properties of the matured bioprinted tissue construct that are crucial for the end application. During tissue formation these properties are influenced by the amount of cells present in the construct, their proliferation, migration and interaction with the material. A calibrated computational framework is able to predict the tissue development and maturation and to optimize the bioprinting input parameters such as the starting material, the initial cell loading and the construct geometry. In this contribution relevant bioink properties are reviewed and discussed on the example of most popular bioprinting approaches. The effect of cells on hydrogel processing and vice versa is highlighted. Furthermore, numerical approaches were reviewed and implemented for depicting the cellular mechanics within the hydrogel as well as for prediction of mechanical properties to achieve the desired hydrogel construct considering cell density, distribution and material–cell interaction.