BROCHURES / DOCUMENTATION
APPLICATION NOTES
SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS
You are researching: β cells
Skin Tissue Engineering
Drug Delivery
Biological Molecules
Solid Dosage Drugs
Stem Cells
Personalised Pharmaceuticals
Inducend Pluripotent Stem Cells (IPSCs)
Drug Discovery
Cancer Cell Lines
Cell Type
Tissue and Organ Biofabrication
All Groups
- Printing Technology
- Biomaterial
- Ceramics
- Metals
- Bioinks
- Fibronectin
- Xanthan Gum
- Paeoniflorin
- Methacrylated Silk Fibroin
- Heparin
- Fibrinogen
- (2-Hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide (HPMA)
- Carrageenan
- Chitosan
- Glycerol
- Poly(glycidol)
- Agarose
- methacrylated chondroitin sulfate (CSMA)
- Silk Fibroin
- Methacrylated hyaluronic acid (HAMA)
- Gellan Gum
- Alginate
- Gelatin-Methacryloyl (GelMA)
- Cellulose
- Hyaluronic Acid
- Polyethylene glycol (PEG) based
- Collagen
- Gelatin
- Novogel
- Peptide gel
- α-Bioink
- Elastin
- Matrigel
- Methacrylated Chitosan
- Pectin
- Pyrogallol
- Fibrin
- Methacrylated Collagen (CollMA)
- Glucosamine
- Non-cellularized gels/pastes
- 2-hydroxyethyl) methacrylate (HEMA)
- Paraffin
- Polyphenylene Oxide
- Acrylamide
- SEBS
- Ionic Liquids
- Jeffamine
- Mineral Oil
- Salecan
- Zein
- poly(octanediol-co-maleic anhydride-co-citrate) (POMaC)
- Poly(itaconate-co-citrate-cooctanediol) (PICO)
- Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)
- Salt-based
- Acrylates
- 2-hydroxyethyl-methacrylate (HEMA)
- Magnetorheological fluid (MR fluid – MRF)
- Poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA)
- PEDOT
- Polyethylene
- Silicone
- Pluronic – Poloxamer
- Carbopol
- Epoxy
- poly (ethylene-co -vinyl acetate) (PEVA)
- Phenylacetylene
- Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAAm)
- Poly(Oxazoline)
- Poly(trimethylene carbonate)
- Polyisobutylene
- Konjac Gum
- Gelatin-Sucrose Matrix
- Chlorella Microalgae
- Poly(Vinyl Formal)
- Thermoplastics
- Micro/nano-particles
- Biological Molecules
- Decellularized Extracellular Matrix (dECM)
- Solid Dosage Drugs
- Review Paper
- Application
- Tissue Models – Drug Discovery
- BioSensors
- Personalised Pharmaceuticals
- In Vitro Models
- Bioelectronics
- Industrial
- Robotics
- Medical Devices
- Electronics – Robotics – Industrial
- Biomaterial Processing
- Tissue and Organ Biofabrication
- Liver tissue Engineering
- Muscle Tissue Engineering
- Nerve – Neural Tissue Engineering
- Meniscus Tissue Engineering
- Heart – Cardiac Patches Tissue Engineering
- Adipose Tissue Engineering
- Trachea Tissue Engineering
- Ocular Tissue Engineering
- Intervertebral Disc (IVD) Tissue Engineering
- Vascularization
- Skin Tissue Engineering
- Drug Delivery
- Cartilage Tissue Engineering
- Bone Tissue Engineering
- Drug Discovery
- Institution
- Myiongji University
- Hong Kong University
- Veterans Administration Medical Center
- University of Applied Sciences Northwestern Switzerland
- University of Michigan, Biointerfaces Institute
- Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute
- Kaohsiung Medical University
- Baylor College of Medicine
- L'Oreal
- University of Bordeaux
- KU Leuven
- Abu Dhabi University
- University of Sheffield
- DTU – Technical University of Denmark
- Hefei University
- Rice University
- University of Barcelona
- INM – Leibniz Institute for New Materials
- University of Nantes
- Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC)
- University of Amsterdam
- Bayreuth University
- Ghent University
- National University of Singapore
- Adolphe Merkle Institute Fribourg
- Zurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW)
- Hallym University
- University of Wurzburg
- AO Research Institute (ARI)
- Chalmers University of Technology
- ETH Zurich
- Nanyang Technological University
- Utrecht Medical Center (UMC)
- University of Manchester
- University of Nottingham
- Trinity College
- National Institutes of Health (NIH)
- Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute
- University of Bucharest
- Innotere
- Nanjing Medical University
- Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering (NIMTE)
- Queen Mary University
- Royal Free Hospital
- SINTEF
- University of Central Florida
- University of Freiburg
- Halle-Wittenberg University
- CIC biomaGUNE
- Chiao Tung University
- University of Geneva
- Novartis
- Karlsruhe institute of technology
- Shanghai University
- Technical University of Dresden
- University of Michigan – School of Dentistry
- University of Tel Aviv
- Aschaffenburg University
- Univerity of Hong Kong
- Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Helmholtz Institute for Pharmaceutical Research Saarland
- Brown University
- Innsbruck University
- National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
- Tiangong University
- Harbin Institute of Technology
- Montreal University
- Anhui Polytechnic
- Jiao Tong University
- University of Toronto
- Politecnico di Torino
- Biomaterials & Bioinks
- Bioprinting Technologies
- Bioprinting Applications
- Cell Type
- Organoids
- Meniscus Cells
- Skeletal Muscle-Derived Cells (SkMDCs)
- Hepatocytes
- Monocytes
- Neutrophils
- Macrophages
- Corneal Stromal Cells
- Mesothelial cells
- Adipocytes
- Synoviocytes
- Human Trabecular Meshwork Cells
- Epithelial
- Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells (HUVECs)
- Spheroids
- Keratinocytes
- Neurons
- Endothelial
- CardioMyocites
- Osteoblasts
- Articular cartilage progenitor cells (ACPCs)
- Cancer Cell Lines
- Chondrocytes
- Fibroblasts
- Myoblasts
- Melanocytes
- Retinal
- Embrionic Kidney (HEK)
- β cells
- Pericytes
- Bacteria
- Tenocytes
- Stem Cells
AUTHOR
Title
Shaping Synthetic Multicellular and Complex Multimaterial Tissues via Embedded Extrusion-Volumetric Printing of Microgels
[Abstract]
Year
2023
Journal/Proceedings
Advanced Materials
Reftype
Groups
AbstractAbstract In living tissues, cells express their functions following complex signals from their surrounding microenvironment. Capturing both hierarchical architectures at the micro- and macroscale, and anisotropic cell patterning remains a major challenge in bioprinting, and a bottleneck towards creating physiologically-relevant models. Addressing this limitation, we introduced a novel technique, termed Embedded Extrusion-Volumetric Printing (EmVP), converging extrusion-bioprinting and layer-less, ultra-fast volumetric bioprinting, allowing to spatially pattern multiple inks/cell types. Light-responsive microgels were developed for the first time as bioresins (μResins) for light-based volumetric bioprinting, providing a microporous environment permissive for cell homing and self-organization. Tuning the mechanical and optical properties of gelatin-based microparticles enables their use as support bath for suspended extrusion printing, in which features containing high cell densities can be easily introduced. μResins can be sculpted within seconds with tomographic light projections into centimetre-scale, granular hydrogel-based, convoluted constructs. Interstitial microvoids enhanced differentiation of multiple stem/progenitor cells (vascular, mesenchymal, neural), otherwise not possible with conventional bulk hydrogels. As proof-of-concept, EmVP was applied to create complex synthetic biology-inspired intercellular communication models, where adipocyte differentiation is regulated by optogenetic-engineered pancreatic cells. Overall, EmVP offers new avenues for producing regenerative grafts with biological functionality, and for developing engineered living systems and (metabolic) disease models. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
AUTHOR
Title
Collagen-Tannic Acid Spheroids for β-Cell Encapsulation Fabricated Using a 3D Bioprinter
[Abstract]
Year
2022
Journal/Proceedings
Advanced Materials Technologies
Reftype
DOI/URL
DOI
Groups
AbstractAbstract Type 1 Diabetes results from autoimmune response elicited against β-cell antigens. Nowadays, insulin injections remain the leading therapeutic option. However, injection treatment fails to emulate the highly dynamic insulin release that β-cells provide. 3D cell-laden microspheres have been proposed during the last years as a major platform for bioengineering insulin-secreting constructs for tissue graft implantation and a model for in vitro drug screening platforms. Current microsphere fabrication technologies have several drawbacks: the need for an oil phase containing surfactants, diameter inconsistency of the microspheres, and high time-consuming processes. These technologies have widely used alginate for its rapid gelation, high processability, and low cost. However, its low biocompatible properties do not provide effective cell attachment. This study proposes a high-throughput methodology using a 3D bioprinter that employs an ECM-like microenvironment for effective cell-laden microsphere production to overcome these limitations. Crosslinking the resulting microspheres with tannic acid prevents collagenase degradation and enhances spherical structural consistency while allowing the diffusion of nutrients and oxygen. The approach allows customization of microsphere diameter with extremely low variability. In conclusion, a novel bio-printing procedure is developed to fabricate large amounts of reproducible microspheres capable of secreting insulin in response to extracellular glucose stimuli.
AUTHOR
Year
2018
Journal/Proceedings
Bioprinting
Reftype
Groups
AbstractThe importance of 3D printing technologies increased significantly over the recent years. They are considered to have a huge impact in regenerative medicine and tissue engineering, since 3D bioprinting enables the production of cell-laden 3D scaffolds. Transition from academic research to pharmaceutical industry or clinical applications, however, is highly dependent on developing a robust and well-known process, while maintaining critical cell characteristics. Hence, a directed and systematic approach to 3D bioprinting process development is required, which also allows for the monitoring of these cell characteristics. This work presents the development of a flow cytometry-based analytical strategy as a tool for 3D bioprinting research. The development was based on a model process using a commercially available alginate-based bioink, the β-cell line INS-1E, and direct dispensing as 3D bioprinting method. We demonstrated that this set-up enabled viability and proliferation analysis. Additionally, use of an automated sampler facilitated high-throughput screenings. Finally, we showed that each process step, e.g. suspension of cells in bioink or 3D printing, cross-linking of the alginate scaffold after printing, has a crucial impact on INS-1E viability. This reflects the importance of process optimization in 3D bioprinting and the usefulness of the flow cytometry-based analytical strategy described here. The presented strategy has a great potential as a cell characterisation tool for 3D bioprinting and may contribute to a more directed process development.